Sunday, March 1, 2020

Eve Chose Wisdom; Sermon, March 1, 2020; Lent 1 on Climate Change


Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-7
Matthew 4:1-11

Who were Adam and Eve?  The first people to not read Apple’s terms and conditions.
--
Do you know what is the oldest computer?
It was an Apple.
But it had extremely limited memory.
Just 1 byte.
Then everything crashed.


One of my Seminary professors wrote a book called Dreaming of Eden, which discusses references to good and evil in secular culture, especially in our favorite films and TV shows.  But she opens the book drawing attention to the Apple computer logo, something I had never thought about.  The logo is an apple with one bite.  Buthold that thought.

This week we read of Adam and Eve in the garden, a story that is so deep in our collective psyche that it shows up again and again in our pop culture: from the apple in the Snow White story, to the Star Trek episode in an idyllic garden, to Voldemort’s snake in Harry Potter – allusions to the Garden of Eden story abound.

As we begin Lent, the 40 days we are encouraged to spend in reflection on our sins and repentance to prepare ourselves for Easter, I think it’s an appropriate time to ask – what is sin?   What’s your definition of sin? Is it the same as evil?  Do you believe in the devil, the tempter, Satan, who some Christians call ‘the enemy’?  Does the devil cause people to do things?  Or is that another word for temptation – that one could not withstand some specific temptation, which is obviously of the devil?

When we discussed this week’s readings in bible study this week – the garden of Eden and Jesus’ 40 days of temptation - one person said the snake in the garden was the devil which makes sense.  The snake acts as Satan’s mouthpiece in the garden to tempt God’s beloved creation away from blind obedience and trust in God.  Because they are flawed humans – or perhaps because one of them is a weak-willed and feeble-minded woman – they succumb to temptation and disobey God, committing the original sin.  As a consequence they are banned from the Garden and all of humanity for all of eternity will struggle to get back to that close of a relationship with God.  And then comes Jesus, part human, part divine, and he alone is able to withstand temptation, because he is not merely a flawed human like us.  And when, at the end of these 40 days, he begins his journey to the cross and dies, to be resurrected 3 days after, providing all of us a pathway back to God.  That’s the most common interpretation of this story, I’d say. 

But if the snake is the devil, how come he is the one telling the truth? 

God tells Adam and Eve that they must not eat of the fruit of the one specific tree in the garden because if they do so, they will die.  But they do not die.  God had lied, and what the snake said was true – their eyes were opened and they became like God, knowing good and evil.  

There’s another interpretation of this story, coming from the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, where the garden is merely a metaphor for our lives as pre-adolescent children – that time when perhaps our parents do lie to us to keep us safe and innocent and carefree and trusting.  And that lasts for a while, until we’ve grown to a point where we become curious.  And independent. Or possibly rebellious and disobedient.  That time when we take chances at making our own decisions, using our own thoughts to discover what we do and don’t agree with, a time when we feel like striking out from the garden of our parents’ protective rules and watchful eye.  The Eastern Orthodox church views the Garden of Eden story as a coming of age story.  We have to leave the garden to truly become independent adults.  In this story, the snake is a truth-teller, and the woman is not weak or feeble-minded; rather the woman desires wisdom.  The woman wants knowledge.  And she wants to share it with others. So with that one bite, she and Adam understand what God understands, have to leave the garden to make their own way in the world, and they gain the free will God gave us to determine our own lives.
 
(Now you are thinking about the apple logo again, right? The Apple with one bite?  The pursuit of wisdom, including all the good and bad ways it manifests.) 

So, getting back to sin – we know the basics, right?  The ‘thou shalt nots’ –no murder, no adultery, no stealing, no lying, no coveting – not to mention having no other Gods and keeping the Sabbath holy.  Then there’s 2 whole books of the bible – long ones – that start laying out many, many more sins, putting them into laws, and the appropriate punishments for each. But then Jesus arrives on the scene and tells people, among other things, that those laws should not cause suffering or supercede human compassion – and that no sinner is beyond redemption and reintegration into community.  And then Saint Paul lays out some others – like gossiping and boasting – in his letters, so we have a few more guidelines.

I would say these are all personal and intentional sins.  Can there be an unintentional sin?
Is sin always in someone’s personal power to do or not do?   Or is there sin in which we are unintentionally complicit?  Or is sin something that has to be within our personal power and personal intention to do?  And what is the relationship between sin and evil?  If good can be created without intention like the secondary impact of, say, mentoring is that the mentored child becomes a role model for younger siblings – then it naturally follows that evil can be created without intention as well, right?

I don’t necessarily have all the answers -  these are honest, rhetorical questionsbut I’d like to say it’s not so black and white.  I believe there are times when our involvement in a system is, in itself, both innocent but also contributes to evil. That is to say, unintentionally sinful.  There are times when we are complicit in creating evil through personal sin without knowing it.  And I think those situations of life where we are complicit in evil but not intentional in our actions are the hardest parts problems that we face – in our families, in our society, in our government, all of it. 

For example, thinking about this on a family level – maybe it’s a marriage situation where one spouse is addicted, and the other does everything possible to keep the family afloat, but the situation creates pain and trauma that enables the addiction and impacts the emotional development of the children.  Or when a parent has a child addicted to drugs and finds themselves in the impossible position of decided whether to continue to provide for their child to keep them safe, knowing that their support is enabling that disease of addiction that has overpowered them both I’m not trying to make light of any of the decisions in such complicated situations. There is no right answer, but there are often unintended consequences that we shy away from calling ‘sin’ but that may contribute to negative outcomes.

Or, on a societal level:  One of the biggest sins and evils in our society is the continued presence of racism and the huge inequity between the races, which was formed over decades of discrimination built into our institutional structures, as well as exercised in the sins of as harassment, intimidation, assault and even murder.  Sometimes talking about race will get boiled down to whether ones’ family once owned slaves or were part of the KKK, because we are trying to assign intentional sin to individuals.  But the race issues we have in this country continue to persist because of the unintentional ways that we have all been complicit – issues around housing, and loans, and education, and policing, and community breakdown.  And yes, even us living here in Nebraska benefit from being the preferred race in this country – we benefit from not being the target of suspicion, accusation, doubt, and having the knowledge that we can go anywhere and do anything without being in danger.  The fact that there is a flip side to that existence – that there are people who regularly wonder if they will be welcome in whatever new space or classroom or town or workplace that they are headed to – that is a sin, it is evil.  And yet, for the most of us, we have never intentionally done anything to harm anyone who doesn’t look like us. 

Or in an economic model.  In Seminary, we all had to write a capstone paper called a Constructive that spelled out how we thought about God, Jesus, Sin, and Ministry.  Most people do these in the context of a congregation, but I had been a health care organizer, so I did mine on health care.  And my definition of Sin and Evil was all about unintentional complicity created by the Capitalist system.  Say you are a small business owner that wants to provide health care for your employees... but profit margins are slim and you have to stay competitive to stay in business.  Your competitor does not offer health care, greatly reducing their labor costs, and your company just can't compete - so you drop health care.  But your employees then, when sick, end up in the world of the uninsured, going to the Emergency Room only when absolutely necessary and therefore creating health care costs they can't pay for, which then get passed onto other peoples' insurance, which then makes health care more expensive, which causes more employers to drop coverage.  It's an evil spiral that keeps getting worse, unintentionally.  

And that brings us to climate change. You may have read in the March Newsletter that this year, the Justice Committee will be presenting, during these 6 weeks of Lent, diverse offerings to help us understand what climate change is, how it will impact us and others, what the timeline is, and what actions we can take to alleviate our sins that have gotten us here. 

What?  Did I just say ‘our sins’?  I did.  None of us got to this place intentionally.  We were just living our lives in the best way that we were offered.  But unfortunately, our lives have had unintended consequences – our unintended sins have created unintentional evil has and will continue to threaten our very way of life and that of future generations.  As our farmers already know, it will continue to impact our food production system, our ecosystem and species survival, the preservation of our property, our world’s beauty, and our health.  And these will manifest itself, first and foremost, on ‘the least of these’ – the poor and the vulnerable globally, nationally and in our own communities.  People of limited means and limited personal power have the least amount of capacity to prepare, adapt and survive the natural disasters and food shortages anticipated in our future. 
In his 40 days with the devil, Jesus was tempted by hunger.  The devil suggested he turn stones to bread.  And he was tempted with security – the devil challenged him to throw himself down and let God save him from the rocks below.  And he was tempted with power – to possess all the kingdoms of the world in their splendor. Jesus said no, and banished the devil from his presence.
We have these same temptations, on a daily basis, and they all relate to climate change.  We grow, produce, eat, and throw out more food than is necessary or healthy or wise, recklessly using excess fossil fuels and adding to carbon pollution, while leading other countries down the same destructive path of fuel-intense farming and overproduction.

We fill ourselves up with anxiety over making sure our lives and livelihoods are secure, all the while ignoring the vast majority of people who will never have security, and shunning those who will lose what security they have as natural disasters intensify because of the climate. 
We resist making changes to our lifestyles, our laws, our regulations, or our economy to preserve our power at the table of nations, making sure that our profits continue, all the while ignoring that the very grandchildren who inherit any wealth we create will also inherit a planet that may not have clean water, glaciers, coral reefs, plants or animal species, sustainable food production, or some of the major cities and beautiful coasts we currently enjoy.
So this Lent needs to be not what you will give up, but what you will live for.  Over the course of the next few weeks, we will explore the temptations of bread, security and power that connect with climate change. We will explore what changes are possible and how to do them – for instance, we will be encouraging all of you to check this tool out from the library in order to discover your home energy usage – and your home energy waste.  There are 2 of these available from Hastings’ library, on a 3-day checkout period.  These tools will help you see how small, easy changes – as easy as turning off monitors when they aren’t being used – actually do matter and actually can contribute towards changing the course we are on.
In the garden, we chose to be wise. Our ancestor Eve chose wisdom.  She chose knowledge.  She chose to know what God knows.  With that knowledge comes the free will and the responsibility to do the critical thinking required when we are unintentionally complicit in evil.  With that wisdom comes the obligation to come to the hard decisions to honor our relationship with God and future generations.  Doing the will of God requires going beyond our own self-interests. As people faithful to a God who calls us to care for the least among us, any action to slow climate change is action not on our behalf, but on behalf of the poor and vulnerable in coming generations. So I implore you to take advantage of the research and preparation of the Justice Committee these next few weeks and discover where you can make small changes and big changes that, collectively, can have a multiplied impact on our world.  And then we will truly have done our work of repenting our sins during this Lenten season.  Let it be so.  Amen.

No comments:

Post a Comment