Genesis 2:15-17; 3:1-7
Matthew 4:1-11
Who were Adam
and Eve? The first people to not read
Apple’s terms and conditions.
--
Do you
know what is the oldest computer?
It was an Apple.
But it had extremely limited memory.
Just 1 byte.
Then everything crashed.
But it had extremely limited memory.
Just 1 byte.
Then everything crashed.
One of my Seminary professors wrote a
book called Dreaming of Eden, which
discusses references to good and evil in secular culture, especially in our
favorite films and TV shows. But she
opens the book drawing attention to the Apple computer logo, something I had
never thought about. The logo is an
apple with one bite. But…hold that thought.
This week we read of Adam and Eve in
the garden, a story that is so deep in our collective psyche that it shows up
again and again in our pop culture: from the apple in the Snow White story, to
the Star Trek episode in an idyllic garden, to Voldemort’s snake in Harry Potter
– allusions to the Garden of Eden story abound.
As we begin Lent, the 40 days we are
encouraged to spend in reflection on our sins and repentance to prepare
ourselves for Easter, I think it’s an appropriate time to ask – what is
sin? What’s your definition of sin? Is
it the same as evil? Do you believe in
the devil, the tempter, Satan, who some Christians call ‘the enemy’? Does the devil cause people to do things? Or is that another word for temptation – that
one could not withstand some specific temptation, which is obviously of the
devil?
When we discussed this week’s readings
in bible study this week – the garden of Eden and Jesus’ 40 days of temptation
- one person said the snake in the garden was the devil… which makes sense. The snake acts as Satan’s mouthpiece in the
garden to tempt God’s beloved creation away from blind obedience and trust in
God. Because they are flawed humans – or
perhaps because one of them is a weak-willed and feeble-minded woman – they
succumb to temptation and disobey God, committing the original sin. As a consequence they are banned from the
Garden and all of humanity for all of eternity will struggle to get back to
that close of a relationship with God.
And then comes Jesus, part human, part divine, and he alone is able to
withstand temptation, because he is not merely a flawed human like us. And when, at the end of these 40 days, he
begins his journey to the cross and dies, to be resurrected 3 days after,
providing all of us a pathway back to God.
That’s the most common interpretation of this story, I’d say.
But if the snake is the devil, how come
he is the one telling the truth?
God tells Adam and Eve that they must
not eat of the fruit of the one specific tree in the garden because if they do
so, they will die. But they do not die.
God had lied, and what the snake said was true – their eyes were opened
and they became like God, knowing good and evil.
There’s another interpretation of this
story, coming from the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church, where the garden is
merely a metaphor for our lives as pre-adolescent children – that time when
perhaps our parents do lie to us to keep us safe and innocent and carefree and
trusting. And that lasts for a while,
until we’ve grown to a point where we become curious. And independent. Or possibly rebellious and
disobedient. That time when we take
chances at making our own decisions, using our own thoughts to discover what we
do and don’t agree with, a time when we feel like striking out from the garden
of our parents’ protective rules and watchful eye. The Eastern Orthodox church views the Garden
of Eden story as a coming of age story.
We have to leave the garden to truly become independent adults. In this story, the snake is a truth-teller,
and the woman is not weak or feeble-minded; rather the woman desires
wisdom. The woman wants knowledge. And she wants to share it with others. So with
that one bite, she and Adam understand what God understands, have to leave the
garden to make their own way in the world, and they gain the free will God gave
us to determine our own lives.
(Now you are thinking about the apple
logo again, right? The Apple with one bite?
The pursuit of wisdom, including all the good and bad ways it manifests….)
So, getting back to sin – we know the
basics, right? The ‘thou shalt nots’ –no
murder, no adultery, no stealing, no lying, no coveting – not to mention having
no other Gods and keeping the Sabbath holy.
Then there’s 2 whole books of the bible – long ones – that start laying
out many, many more sins, putting them into laws, and the appropriate
punishments for each. But then Jesus arrives on the scene and tells people,
among other things, that those laws should not cause suffering or supercede
human compassion – and that no sinner is beyond redemption and reintegration
into community. And then Saint Paul lays
out some others – like gossiping and boasting – in his letters, so we have a
few more guidelines.
I would say these are all personal and
intentional sins. Can there be an
unintentional sin?
Is sin always in someone’s personal
power to do or not do? Or is there sin in which we are
unintentionally complicit? Or is sin
something that has to be within our personal power and personal intention to
do? And what is the relationship between
sin and evil? If good can be created
without intention… like
the secondary impact of, say, mentoring is that the mentored child becomes a
role model for younger siblings – then it naturally follows that evil can be
created without intention as well, right?
I don’t necessarily have all the
answers - these are honest, rhetorical
questions…but I’d like
to say it’s not so black and white. I
believe there are times when our involvement in a system is, in
itself, both innocent but also contributes to evil…. That is to say, unintentionally sinful. There are times when we are complicit in
creating evil through personal sin without knowing it. And I think those situations of life where we are
complicit in evil but not intentional in our actions are the hardest parts
problems that we face – in our families, in our society, in our government, all
of it.
For example, thinking about this on a family
level – maybe it’s a marriage situation where one spouse is addicted, and the
other does everything possible to keep the family afloat, but the situation
creates pain and trauma that enables the addiction and impacts the emotional
development of the children. Or when a
parent has a child addicted to drugs and finds themselves in the impossible
position of decided whether to continue to provide for their child to keep them
safe, knowing that their support is enabling that disease of addiction that has
overpowered them both… I’m not
trying to make light of any of the decisions in such complicated situations.
There is no right answer, but there are often unintended consequences that we
shy away from calling ‘sin’ but that may contribute to negative outcomes.
Or, on a societal level: One of the biggest sins and evils in our
society is the continued presence of racism and the huge inequity between the
races, which was formed over decades of discrimination built into our
institutional structures, as well as exercised in the sins of as harassment,
intimidation, assault and even murder.
Sometimes talking about race will get boiled down to whether ones’
family once owned slaves or were part of the KKK, because we are trying to
assign intentional sin to individuals.
But the race issues we have in this country continue to persist because
of the unintentional ways that we have all been complicit – issues around
housing, and loans, and education, and policing, and community breakdown. And yes, even us living here in Nebraska
benefit from being the preferred race in this country – we benefit from not
being the target of suspicion, accusation, doubt, and having the knowledge that
we can go anywhere and do anything without being in danger. The fact that there is a flip side to that
existence – that there are people who regularly wonder if they will be welcome
in whatever new space or classroom or town or workplace that they are headed to
– that is a sin, it is evil. And yet,
for the most of us, we have never intentionally done anything to harm anyone
who doesn’t look like us.
Or in an economic model. In Seminary, we all had to write a capstone paper called a Constructive that spelled out how we thought about God, Jesus, Sin, and Ministry. Most people do these in the context of a congregation, but I had been a health care organizer, so I did mine on health care. And my definition of Sin and Evil was all about unintentional complicity created by the Capitalist system. Say you are a small business owner that wants to provide health care for your employees... but profit margins are slim and you have to stay competitive to stay in business. Your competitor does not offer health care, greatly reducing their labor costs, and your company just can't compete - so you drop health care. But your employees then, when sick, end up in the world of the uninsured, going to the Emergency Room only when absolutely necessary and therefore creating health care costs they can't pay for, which then get passed onto other peoples' insurance, which then makes health care more expensive, which causes more employers to drop coverage. It's an evil spiral that keeps getting worse, unintentionally.
And that brings us to climate change. You may
have read in the March Newsletter that this year, the Justice Committee will be
presenting, during these 6 weeks of Lent, diverse offerings to help us
understand what climate change is, how it will impact us and others, what the
timeline is, and what actions we can take to alleviate our sins that have
gotten us here.
What? Did I just say ‘our sins’? I did.
None of us got to this place intentionally. We were just living our lives in the best way
that we were offered. But unfortunately,
our lives have had unintended consequences – our unintended sins have created
unintentional evil has and will continue to threaten our
very way of life and that of future generations. As our farmers already know, it will continue
to impact our food production system, our ecosystem and species survival, the
preservation of our property, our world’s beauty, and our health. And these will manifest itself, first
and foremost, on ‘the least of these’ – the poor and the vulnerable globally,
nationally and in our own communities.
People of limited means and limited personal power have the least amount
of capacity to prepare, adapt and survive the natural disasters and food
shortages anticipated in our future.
In his 40 days with the devil, Jesus was tempted
by hunger. The devil suggested he turn
stones to bread. And he was tempted with
security – the devil challenged him to throw himself down and let God save him
from the rocks below. And he was tempted
with power – to possess all the kingdoms of the world in their splendor. Jesus
said no, and banished the devil from his presence.
We have these same temptations, on a daily basis,
and they all relate to climate change.
We grow, produce, eat, and throw out more food than is necessary or
healthy or wise, recklessly using excess fossil fuels and adding to carbon
pollution, while leading other countries down the same destructive path of
fuel-intense farming and overproduction.
We fill ourselves up
with anxiety over making sure our lives and livelihoods are secure, all the
while ignoring the vast majority of people who will never have security, and
shunning those who will lose what security they have as natural disasters
intensify because of the climate.
We resist making changes
to our lifestyles, our laws, our regulations, or our economy to preserve our
power at the table of nations, making sure that our profits continue, all the
while ignoring that the very grandchildren who inherit any wealth we create
will also inherit a planet that may not have clean water, glaciers, coral
reefs, plants or animal species, sustainable food production, or some of the
major cities and beautiful coasts we currently enjoy.
So this Lent needs to be not what you will give
up, but what you will live for. Over
the course of the next few weeks, we will explore the temptations of bread,
security and power that connect with climate change. We will explore what
changes are possible and how to do them – for instance, we will be encouraging
all of you to check this tool out from the library in order to discover your
home energy usage – and your home energy waste.
There are 2 of these available from Hastings’ library, on a 3-day
checkout period. These tools will help
you see how small, easy changes – as easy as turning off monitors when they
aren’t being used – actually do matter and actually can contribute towards
changing the course we are on.
In the garden, we chose to be wise.
Our ancestor Eve chose wisdom. She chose
knowledge. She chose to know what God
knows. With that knowledge comes the
free will and the responsibility to do the critical thinking required when we
are unintentionally complicit in evil.
With that wisdom comes the obligation to come to the hard decisions to
honor our relationship with God and future generations. Doing the will of God requires going beyond our own
self-interests. As people faithful to a God who calls us to care for
the least among us, any action to slow climate change is action not on our
behalf, but on behalf of the poor and vulnerable in coming generations. So I
implore you to take advantage of the research and preparation of the Justice
Committee these next few weeks and discover where you can make small changes
and big changes that, collectively, can have a multiplied impact on our world. And then we will truly have done our work of
repenting our sins during this Lenten season.
Let it be so. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment